Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027763
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Makulatranslokation – eine Therapie der neovaskuläre Makuladegeneration im Zeitalter der Anti-VEGF-Therapie?
Macular Translocation – A Therapeutic Approach for Neovascular Macular Degeneration in the Era of Anti-VEGF Therapy?Publication History
Eingegangen: 30.6.2008
Angenommen: 7.8.2008
Publication Date:
27 January 2009 (online)

Zusammenfassung
Nachdem durch die VEGF-Inhibition eine signifikante Verbesserung für selektierte Patienten mit einer neovaskulären altersabhängigen Makuladegeneration (AMD) erreicht werden konnte, wird die Makulachirurgie – und hier unter anderem die Makulatranslokation (FMT: full macular translocation) – deutlich seltener für die neovaskuläre AMD angewendet. Dennoch kann diese Therapieoption in Einzelfällen sinnvoll sein. Eine prospektiv randomisierte Studie wies auf die Überlegenheit der Translokation gegenüber der photodynamischen Therapie (PDT) in Bezug auf eine möglichen Visusverbesserung hin. Weil trotz der operativen Komplikationen und der Störung des Binokularsehens viele Patienten mit Lesevisus und Lebensqualität deutlich von der FMT profitierten, sind Überlegungen gerechtfertigt, ob die aufwendige Operation in bestimmten Situationen eine sinnvolle Alternative darstellen kann. Hier muss berücksichtigt werden, dass den Zulassungsstudien von Anti-VEGF-Therapien eine Selektion vorausging, die im Vergleich zur täglichen Routine einen erheblichen Anteil der Patienten ausschloss. Deshalb können als mögliche Indikationen der FMT unter anderem Therapieversager der Anti-VEGF-Therapie, Patienten mit ausgedehnten submakulären Blutungen sowie Rupturen des Pigmentepithels gelten. Für die FMT sind aber wichtige Einschränkungen wie z. B. hohe Hyperopie, eine gute Funktion des Partnerauges und ausgedehnte Läsionen der choroidalen Neovaskularisation (CNV) zu beachten. Eine ausführliche Aufklärung möglicher Kandidaten über die relevanten Komplikationen ist eine selbstverständliche Vorbedingung.
Abstract
Since anti-VEGF treatment has been proven to achieve a significant improvement of visual acuity in a cohort of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD), macular surgery and particularly the macular translocation with 360° retinotomy (FMT: full macular translocation) have lost their former popularity. However, the approach of macular surgery still remains a promising therapy in selected cases. A prospective randomised study, comparing FMT and photodynamic therapy in subfoveal classic choroidal neovascularisation (CNV), recently showed the superiority of FMT in terms of visual gain. In spite of the postoperative complications and the disturbed binocular vision, the reading acuity and the life quality of many patients improved. Therefore, it is justified to discuss the chances and advantages of the FMT at least in selected cases. After all, case selection was an important determinant also in the phase III studies of ranibizumab; many patients seen during the routine consulting hours were excluded as a consequence of the study criteria. Most of them were suspected to achieve a less favourable outcome of the anti-VEGF regimen. Thus, patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria of recent studies or showed no response to the anti-VEGF therapy, as well as patients with extensive submacular bleeding or ruptures of the pigment epithelium can also be considered as candidates of FMT. Generally, in the presence of highly effective anti-VEGF drugs, FMT can be discussed for second-line treatment, if the fellow eye has poor function and no additional risk factors of the affected eye are known (e. g., hyperopia, large lesion size, etc). Detailed information relating to the potential adverse events have to be mentioned. Although the indication is restricted, surgeons should have the continuing ability to perform the challenging surgical procedure.
Schlüsselwörter
altersbedingte Makuladegeneration - Makulatranslokation - Anti-VEGF - Bevacizumab - Ranibizumab - Pegaptanib
Key words
age-related macular degeneration - macular translocation - anti-VEGF - bevacizumab - ranibizumab - pegaptanib
Literatur
- 1
Brown D M, Kaiser P K, Michels M. et al .
Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
N Engl J Med.
2006;
355
1432-1444
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Michels S, Rosenfeld P J.
Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with Ranibizumab/Lucentis.
Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd.
2005;
222
480-484
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Macular Photocoagulation Study Group .
Laser photocoagulation of subfoveal neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration.
Updated findings from two clinical trials.
Arch Ophthalmol.
1993;
111
1200-1209
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Treatment in Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) study group .
Photodynamic therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular
degeneration with verteporfin: one-year results of 2 randomized clinical trials –
TAP report. Treatment of age-related macular degeneration with photodynamic therapy
(TAP) Study Group.
Arch Ophthalmol.
1999;
117
1329-1345
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Verteporphin in Photodynamic Therapy Study Group .
Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular
degeneration: two-year results of a randomized clinical trial including lesions with
occult with no classic choroidal neovascularization – verteporfin in photodynamic
therapy report 2.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2001;
131
541-560
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Potter M J, Szabo S M.
Recurrence of choroidal neovascularisation after photodynamic therapy in patients
with age-related macular degeneration.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2007;
91
753-756
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Bressler N M, Bressler S B, Hawkins B S. et al .
Submacular surgery trials randomized pilot trial of laser photocoagulation versus
surgery for recurrent choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular
degeneration: I. Ophthalmic outcomes submacular surgery trials pilot study report
number 1.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2000;
130
387-407
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Eckardt C, Eckardt U, Conrad H G.
Macular rotation with and without counter-rotation of the globe in patients with age-related
macular degeneration.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
1999;
237
313-325
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Machemer R.
Macular translocation.
Am J Ophthalmol.
1998;
125
698-700
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Gelisken F, Karim-Zoda K, Grisanti S. et al .
Macular translocation with 360 degrees retinotomy for retinal pigment epithelial tear.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2005;
243
619-621
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Freedman S F, Holgado S, Enyedi L B. et al .
Management of ocular torsion and diplopia after macular translocation for age-related
macular degeneration: prospective clinical study.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2003;
136
640-648
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Klainguti G, Nguyen C.
Surgical management of monocular torsion and head tilt after macular translocation.
Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd.
2005;
222
222-225
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Sato M, Terasaki H, Ogino N. et al .
Strabological findings after macular translocation surgery with 360 degrees retinotomy.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2003;
44
1939-1944
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Makulakomission .
Position of the Retinological Society, the German Ophthalmological Society and the
Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on the current therapeutic
possibilities for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd.
2007;
224
559-566
MissingFormLabel
- 15 Novartis Pharma GmbH .Fachinformation Lucentis®. Rote Liste GmbH 2007
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Brown D M, Kaiser P K, Michels M. et al .
Supplementary Appendix. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related
macular degeneration.
N Engl J Med.
2006;
355
S1-S15
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Rosenfeld P J, Brown D M, Heier J S. et al .
Supplementary Appendix. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
N Engl J Med.
2006;
355
S1-S17
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Krebs I, Ansari-Shahrezaei S, Goll A. et al .
Activity of neovascular lesions treated with bevacizumab: comparison between optical
coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2008;
246
811-815
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Heimes B, Lommatzsch A, Zeimer M. et al .
Foveal RPE autofluorescence as a prognostic factor for anti-VEGF therapy in exudative
AMD.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2008;
246
1229-1234
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Brantley M A, Fang A M, King J M. et al .
Association of complement factor H and LOC387715 genotypes with response of exudative
age-related macular degeneration to intravitreal bevacizumab.
Ophthalmology.
2007;
114
2168-2173
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Gelisken Jr F, Voelker M, Schwabe R. et al .
Full macular translocation versus photodynamic therapy with verteporfin in the treatment
of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: 1-year results of a prospective,
controlled, randomised pilot trial (FMT-PDT).
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2007;
245
1085-1095
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Ziemssen F, Lüke M, Bartz-Schmidt K U. et al .
Time-dependent effects on contrast sensitivity, near and distance acuity: difference
in functional parameters? (Prospective, randomized pilot trial of photodynamic therapy
versus full macular translocation).
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2008;
246
653-659
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Cahill M T, Stinnett S S, Banks A D. et al .
Quality of life after macular translocation with 360 degrees peripheral retinectomy
for age-related macular degeneration.
Ophthalmology.
2005;
112
144-151
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Luke M, Ziemssen F, Bartz-Schmidt K U. et al .
Quality of life in a prospective, randomised pilot-trial of photodynamic therapy versus
full macular translocation in treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
– a report of 1 year results.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2007;
245
1831-1836
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Luke M, Ziemssen F, Bartz-Schmidt K U. et al .
Quality of life in a prospective, randomised pilot-trial of photodynamic therapy versus
full macular translocation in treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration
– a report of 1 year results.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2007;
245
1831-1836
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Lanzetta P. ANCHOR and PIER study group .
Ranibizumab and patient-reported outcomes: VFQ-25 data from the ANCHOR and PIER trials
in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2008;
49
E-5571
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Nguyen N X, Besch D, Bartz-Schmidt K. et al .
Reading performance with low-vision aids and vision-related quality of life after
macular translocation surgery in patients with age-related macular degeneration.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
2007;
85
877-882
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Falkner C I, Leitich H, Frommlet F. et al .
The end of submacular surgery for age-related macular degeneration? A meta-analysis.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2007;
245
490-501
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Lux A, Llacer H, Heussen F M. et al .
Non-responders to bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy of choroidal neovascular lesions.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2007;
91
1318-1322
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Suesskind D, Voelker M, Bartz-Schmidt K U. et al .
Full macular translocation following photodynamic therapy in neovascular age-related
macular degeneration.
Eye.
2007;
22
834-837
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Rosenfeld P J, Shapiro H, Tuomi L. et al .
Lesion characteristics in Ranibizumab treated patients with a visual acuity gain or
loss in the MARINA and ANCHOR trials for wet age-related macular degeneration.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2008;
49
E-329
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Casswell A G, Kohen D, Bird A C.
Retinal pigment epithelial detachments in the elderly: classification and outcome.
Br J Ophthalmol.
1985;
69
397-403
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Gelisken F, Inhoffen W, Partsch M. et al .
Retinal pigment epithelial tear after photodynamic therapy for choroidal neovascularization.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2001;
131
518-520
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Hoskin A, Bird A C, Sehmi K.
Tears of detached retinal pigment epithelium.
Br J Ophthalmol.
1981;
65
417-422
MissingFormLabel
- 35
Chan C K, Meyer C H, Gross J G. et al .
Retinal pigment epithelial tears after intravitreal bevacizumab injection for neovascular
age-related macular degeneration.
Retina.
2007;
27
541-551
MissingFormLabel
- 36
Gelisken F, Ziemssen F, Voelker M. et al .
Retinal pigment epithelial tears after single administration of intravitreal bevacizumab
for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Eye.
2008;
E-Pub
MissingFormLabel
- 37
Amselem L, Pulido J S, Diaz-Llopis M. et al .
Retinal pigment epithelial tear following ranibizumab use.
Eye.
2007;
21
846-847
MissingFormLabel
- 38
Dhalla M S, Blinder K J, Tewari A. et al .
Retinal pigment epithelial tear following intravitreal pegaptanib sodium.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2006;
141
752-754
MissingFormLabel
- 39
Leitritz M, Gelisken F, Inhoffen W. et al .
Can the risk of retinal pigment epithelium tears after bevacizumab treatment be predicted?
An optical coherence tomography study.
Eye.
2008;
E-Pub
MissingFormLabel
- 40
Lüke M, Januschowski K, Warga M. et al .
The retinal tolerance to bevacizumab in co-application with a recombinant tissue plasminogen
activator.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2007;
91
1077-1082
MissingFormLabel
- 41
Meyer C H, Scholl H P, Eter N. et al .
Combined treatment of acute subretinal haemorrhages with intravitreal recombined tissue
plasminogen activator, expansile gas and bevacizumab: a retrospective pilot study.
Acta Ophthalmol.
2008;
E-Pub
MissingFormLabel
- 42
Stifter E, Michels S, Prager F. et al .
Intravitreal bevacizumab therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
with large submacular hemorrhage.
Am J Ophthalmol.
2007;
144
886-892
MissingFormLabel
- 43
Scupola A, Coscas G, Soubrane G. et al .
Natural history of macular subretinal hemorrhage in age-related macular degeneration.
Ophthalmologica.
1999;
213
97-102
MissingFormLabel
- 44
Schmidt J C, Meyer C H, Horle S.
Massive subretinal hemorrhages. A challenge for vitreous body surgeons.
Ophthalmologe.
2004;
101
584-588
MissingFormLabel
- 45
Bhisitkul R B, Winn B J, Lee O T. et al .
Neuroprotective effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide against photoreceptor
apoptosis in a rabbit model of subretinal hemorrhage.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2008;
E-Pub
MissingFormLabel
- 46
Mruthyunjaya P, Stinnett S S, Toth C A.
Change in visual function after macular translocation with 360 degrees retinectomy
for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Ophthalmology.
2004;
111
1715-1724
MissingFormLabel
- 47
Ninomiya Y, Lewis J M, Hasegawa T. et al .
Retinotomy and foveal translocation for surgical management of subfoveal choroidal
neovascular membranes.
Am J Ophthalmol.
1996;
122
613-621
MissingFormLabel
- 48
Algvere P, Bill A.
Effects of vitrectomy and phakectomy on the drainage of the vitreous compartment.
Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol.
1981;
216
253-260
MissingFormLabel
- 49
Aisenbrey S, Bartz-Schmidt K U, Walter P. et al .
Long-term follow-up of macular translocation with 360 degrees retinotomy for exudative
age-related macular degeneration.
Arch Ophthalmol.
2007;
125
1367-1372
MissingFormLabel
- 50
Neugebauer A, Fricke J.
Sensory problems after macular translocation.
Ophthalmologe.
2002;
99
156-159
MissingFormLabel
- 51
Yang Y. ANCHOR study group .
Two year contrast sensitivity results from the ANCHOR study comparing intravitreal
ranibizumab 0.3 mg and 0.5 mg with verteporphin therapy of predominantly classic CNV
lesions secondary to age-related macular degeneration.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci.
2008;
48
E-4545
MissingFormLabel
- 52
Wu L, Martinez-Castellanos M A, Quiroz-Mercado H. et al .
Twelve-month safety of intravitreal injections of bevacizumab (Avastin(R)): results
of the Pan-American Collaborative Retina Study Group (PACORES).
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol.
2008;
246
81-87
MissingFormLabel
- 53
Shima C, Sakaguchi H, Gomi F. et al .
Complications in patients after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand.
2008;
86
372-376
MissingFormLabel
- 54
McGimpsey S J, Gillies M C.
Treatment of macular degeneration--controversy and hope.
Br J Ophthalmol.
2008;
92
436-437
MissingFormLabel
PD Dr. Faik Gelisken
Department für Augenheilkunde, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen
Schleichstr. 12
72076 Tübginen
Phone: ++ 49/70 71/2 98 37 21
Fax: ++ 49/70 71/29 52 15
Email: faik.gelisken@med.uni-tuebingen.de